AUTOBRIDGE

designing a better car search experience

Buying a car should feel exciting, not exhausting. But for many, especially first-time buyers, the process is confusing, cluttered, and deeply overwhelming.

Filters don’t help, comparisons are unclear, and most platforms prioritize sellers over users. I set out to flip the script, by designing a truly buyer-focused experience.

Driven by Clarity: Reimagining the Car Search for Real People

AutoBridge is a digital solution aimed at simplifying and personalizing the car search journey for everyday users.

This case study showcases how I applied user-centered design methods to uncover real user pain points, define key opportunity areas, and design a more intuitive, confidence-building experience for car shoppers. By focusing on the user's mindset not just filters and listings, AutoBridge reimagines the car search process with clarity, personalization, and trust at its core.

MY ROLE

Wearing many hats as an end-to-end UX/UI designer, I conducted user interviews, ideated with sketches, built wireframes and prototypes, and iteratively tested to refine the experience, ensuring every decision was rooted in user needs.

tools used

Figma, Miro, FlowMapp, Google Forms

Understanding the roadblocks

I spoke with real car buyers to understand why the process feels so overwhelming. Their stories revealed frustration, decision fatigue, and a clear need for more guidance and trust.

I spoke with real car buyers to understand why the process feels so overwhelming. Their stories revealed frustration, decision fatigue, and a clear need for more guidance and trust.

“Sometimes I have to spend at least 10 - 20 minutes researching each and every one of them, which I generally do not do.”

RESEARCH

To understand the challenges faced by car buyers, I conducted both secondary and primary research. This dual approach helped me uncover user pain points, expectations, and motivations during the car search process.

I analyzed existing data from credible sources like reports, surveys, and articles to uncover trends, user behavior, and industry gaps. This helped me build a strong foundation before conducting primary research.

Secondary Research Insights

Top three car buying research methods and factors
Top three car buying research methods and factors
Percentage of respondents who abandoned thier search or regretted their purchase
Percentage of respondents who abandoned thier search or regretted their purchase

Percentage of Respondents Who Abandoned Their Search or Regretted Their Purchase

PRIMARY Research Insights

I conducted semi-structured virtual interviews with 5 participants who were either actively looking for a car or had recently gone through the car-buying process. The interviews were designed to explore their motivations, pain points, and decision-making behaviors.

The goal was to uncover real user frustrations and needs in the car search experience, especially for first-time buyers navigating online platforms.

Semi-structured virtual interviews with 5 first-time and experienced car buyers revealed recurring frustrations - from overwhelming interfaces to a lack of trusted guidance.

User Quotes and Insights
User Quotes and Insights

These are the key Jobs To Be Done to focus the design on real user goals and desired outcomes during the car buying journey.

Turning Problems into Possibilities

I identified key barriers in the car-buying journey and reframed them as design opportunities.


  1. How might we ensure that car specifications and features are presented in an easily understandable way?


  2. How might we curate expert reviews, comparison tools, and owner testimonials in one easy-to-navigate platform?


  3. How might we offer personalized recommendations based on buyer preferences and driving habits?

I identified key barriers in the car-buying journey and reframed them as design opportunities.


  1. How might we ensure that car specifications and features are presented in an easily understandable way?


  2. How might we curate expert reviews, comparison tools, and owner testimonials in one easy-to-navigate platform?


  3. How might we offer personalized recommendations based on buyer preferences and driving habits?

Synthesis methods were essential for me to transform research findings into structured, actionable insights for improving the car buying experience.

Affinity Map

I synthesized interview insights into an affinity map to uncover recurring pain points and behavioral patterns. This process revealed key themes like information overload, difficulty comparing options, distrust in reviews, and a need for personalized recommendations. These findings directly informed my design direction.

research synthesis

Affinity Map
Affinity Map

Affinity mapping helped surface common user frustrations - ranging from overwhelming information and unclear filters to a lack of trusted reviews and personalized support.

empathy Map

I used the empathy map to capture what users said, thought, did, and felt throughout their car buying journey. It revealed how often they felt overwhelmed, uncertain, and unsupported. These emotional insights helped me design with empathy and focus on reducing cognitive load.

Empathy Map
Empathy Map

personas

I created three personas based on interview patterns: the Tech-Savvy Analyst, the Budget-Conscious Shopper, and the Safety-First Parent. These personas guided my design decisions by keeping user motivations, frustrations, and behaviors at the center of the process.

Empathy map visualizes what users say, think, feel, and do - helping me design with greater emotional insight.

These three personas represent distinct buyer mindsets and align the design with real user needs.

Jobs To Be Done (JTBD)

I defined Jobs To Be Done to clarify what users hoped to achieve. They wanted to compare options easily, feel confident in their decision, and find a car that fits their lifestyle. These jobs helped me stay focused on delivering solutions that meet real user needs.

Jobs To Be Done
Jobs To Be Done

Ideas that bridge the gap

Ideas that bridge the gap

"As a car buyer, I want a side by side comparison of specifications, pricing and reviews so that I can make an informed decision."

Mapping the user journey to uncover key friction points was challenging but rewarding. I then sketched and iterated toward an MVP that balanced value and simplicity.

Ideation

In the early ideation phase, I focused on what would truly reduce user frustration and bring clarity. Three key ideas emerged as core MVP features:

  • First, easy access to car details and smart filtering options, so users can quickly narrow down choices based on what actually matters to them.

  • Second, a centralized platform for user and expert reviews, helping users feel more confident and informed.

  • And third, personalized car listings - showing recommendations based on individual needs and preferences, whether that’s safety, price, or features.
    These ideas shaped my early sketches and informed the direction of the design moving forward.

Ideation Sketches
Ideation Sketches

Ideation Sketches

Minimum Viable Product
Minimum Viable Product

Minimum Viable Product (MVP)

USER FLOW

This user flow is divided into Sitemap, High-Level, and Low-Level views to convey the overall structure, key actions, and in-depth task flows.

SiteMap

low level

high level

Sitemap

SiteMap

low level

high level

Sitemap

from concepts to screens

The design phase was a really delightful part of the process! I kicked things off with quick, hand-drawn sketches to get my ideas flowing and explore different layouts. Then I turned those into simple wireframes and wireflows to map out how users would move through the app.

To set the vibe, I put together a moodboard and style guide that nailed down the colors, fonts, and overall look. Finally, I polished everything into high-fidelity mockups that brought the whole experience to life - clean, clear, and ready for users.

sketching

To quickly explore layout directions and prioritize core functionality, I began with hand-drawn wireframes. This allowed me to sketch freely, experiment with structure, and focus on what mattered most without getting caught up in visual details.

It was a fast, low-pressure way to test ideas and map out the user journey. This early step ensured that design decisions were rooted in clarity, usability, and the real needs of users, helping me move into digital wireframing with confidence and direction.

Paper Sketches
Paper Sketches

Paper Sketches

low fidelity wireframes

To explore the structure and flow of the product, I created low-fidelity wireframes covering key touchpoints like onboarding, search, and comparison. These wireframes allowed for quick iteration and feedback before moving into higher fidelity.

Low Fidelity Wireframes

Key touchpoints like onboarding, search results and comparison screens

Low Fidelity Wireframes

Key touchpoints like onboarding, search results and comparison screens

Key touchpoints like onboarding, search results and comparison screens

wireflow

The wireflow outlines the sequence of screens and user decisions, providing a visual blueprint of the product’s navigation flow.

wireflow
wireflow

To bring the experience to life, I created a moodboard and style guide that set the tone for the high-fidelity design.

I chose a yellow and blue color palette, where yellow conveys warmth and optimism, and blue builds a sense of trust and reliability.

For typography, I used Nunito Sans for its clarity and modern, friendly feel, aligning with the goals of ease of use and approachability.

These visual choices helped reinforce the product’s values: clarity, trust, and simplicity, while delivering a clean, user-friendly interface.

To bring the experience to life, I created a moodboard and style guide that set the tone for the high-fidelity design.

I chose a yellow and blue color palette, where yellow conveys warmth and optimism, and blue builds a sense of trust and reliability.

For typography, I used Nunito Sans for its clarity and modern, friendly feel, aligning with the goals of ease of use and approachability.

These visual choices helped reinforce the product’s values: clarity, trust, and simplicity, while delivering a clean, user-friendly interface.

moodboard and styleguide

family in a car
family in a car
handshake
handshake
Successful purchase of car
Successful purchase of car
searching car details
searching car details
Blue car
Blue car
Trusted app
Trusted app
Boy playing with a yellow car
Boy playing with a yellow car
Happy family in fall season
Happy family in fall season
Style Guide
High Fidelity Mockup screens
High Fidelity Mockup screens

Onboarding ———>Questionnaire ———>Car results ———> Car details (Specs, Pricing, User Reviews) ———> Favorites

high fidelity

The final screens bring the design vision to life, showcasing features like personalized listings, a clean car detail view, and a side-by-side comparison tool, all aimed at reducing cognitive load and enabling smarter decisions.

Built on the style guide, the design ensures consistency, clarity, and trust. I focused on layout balance, intuitive labeling, basic icons, and accessibility best practices, like readable fonts and strong contrast, to support usability for all users.

The final screens bring the design vision to life, showcasing features like personalized listings, a clean car detail view, and a side-by-side comparison tool, all aimed at reducing cognitive load and enabling smarter decisions.

Built on the style guide, the design ensures consistency, clarity, and trust. I focused on layout balance, intuitive labeling, basic icons, and accessibility best practices, like readable fonts and strong contrast, to support usability for all users.

Style Guide
Style Guide

Brand Attributes: Trust-worthy, User-centric, Simplicity, Transparency

from static to dynamic

I created clickable prototype with animations and smooth transitions to bring the design to life. It made navigating through the app feel natural and gave a real sense of how everything would work before building it for real.

Prototyping played a key role in this project. It allowed for early validation of design decisions, helped uncover usability issues before development, and made it easier to communicate ideas.

I added key interactions to simulate a realistic experience including:

  • Smooth transitions between tabs like Specs, Reviews, and Pricing

  • Animated filter toggles for selecting personal preferences

  • And subtle micro-interactions, like the animated favorite icon, to enhance feedback and engagement.

These interactive elements brought the design to life and helped test how users actually navigate the app.

Prototype

smooth transition interaction
smooth transition interaction
Switching tabs interaction
Switching tabs interaction
Filter interaction
Filter interaction
Heart icon interaction
Heart icon interaction

REAL USERS, REAL FEEDBACK

I conducted usability tests with real users to see how they interacted with the prototype. Their feedback helped me identify pain points and areas to improve, making sure the final design was easy and enjoyable to use.

I conducted two rounds of remote usability testing, first with 5 participants, and later with 3, to evaluate and refine the prototype.




Usability testing

Voices from Usability Testing

Before

Car image not clickable
clicking car image navigates to the car details page

After

Clicking the car image navigates to the car details page

when the option box is clicked , the option will be selected

After

only if the radio button is selected the option will be selected

Before

Clicking the option box selects the radiobutton

Filter label was missing  which was fixed
Filter label was missing  which was fixed

Filter label added

Specifications were cut off on screen scroll, which was fixed

Specifications layout modified

changed to text
changed to text
symbols are used
symbols are used

Symbols to text

Symbols to text

Before

After

Before

After

After

Before

After

Filter label added

Specifications were cut off on screen scroll, which was fixed
Specifications were cut off on screen scroll, which was fixed

In Round 2, feedback focused more on accessibility and clarity:

  • Users wanted clearer navigation cues, especially for icons like the heart

  • And the ‘<’ symbol was confusing, suggesting that text-based labels might be more intuitive

    These insights directly guided the next set of refinements and improved the overall user experience.

Round 1 revealed key issues:

  • Car specs were getting cut off in the comparison view

  • The mileage filter on the pricing page was unclear

  • Users expected clicking the label to also select the radio button

  • And they wanted car images to be clickable for quicker navigation

Before

Car image not clickable
Car image not clickable
clicking car image navigates to the car details page
clicking car image navigates to the car details page

After

Clicking the car image navigates to the car details page

when the option box is clicked , the option will be selected
when the option box is clicked , the option will be selected

After

only if the radio button is selected the option will be selected
only if the radio button is selected the option will be selected

Before

Clicking the option box selects the radiobutton

Lightbulb moments

Through this project, I learned how simplifying complexity creates meaningful user experiences. Research and testing are critical - they challenged my assumptions and strengthened the design. Most importantly, I saw how empathy, not just features, drives better solutions.

What I'd do differently:

  • I’d involve users even earlier in the design process, especially during sketching.

  • I'd like to explore deeper personalization using onboarding questions to guide search results.

  • Adding accessibility testing would ensure inclusive design from the start.




 

Next Steps

To conclude, here’s what really worked in this project:

  • A simplified comparison flow

  • Fewer, more relevant options - no information overload

  • And a user-friendly design that supports clear decision-making

For the next steps, I plan to:

  • Integrate seller-side features to support real-time listings

  • Add personalization, so users can get suggestions based on their needs

  • Include more detailed safety information - especially important for safety-first users

  • And design advanced features for car enthusiasts and experts looking for deeper insights

This project laid a strong foundation and there's a lot of exciting potential to build on.

AutoBridge simplifies the car search by turning overwhelming data into clear, trusted guidance. It’s a step toward making car buying easier, smarter, and more user-centered.

 

Thank You for reading!